Animal rights

COWS CAN BE POTTY TRAINED – SERIOUSLY

A really great article popped up on my feed by David Grimm in Science magazine.  He stated that research has been done which shows cows can be potty trained, just like many other animals.  My first thought was, of course, “Cool, now I can have a house cow!” but there is a deeper moral implication to this.  Industrial farming locks animals up in tiny cages because its easier on the humans to sluice down a waste trough than to clean up after free ranging animals.  The dairies that tried to give their cows more freedom had cow droppings every where – inside the barns as well as out in the barn yards.  So utilitarian ethics reduced cows to bio-machines that produced milk and dairies became giant warehouses for cows.

The experiment cited said 16 calves were led down a corridor to a specific area technically called the cow commode.  Grimm said the use name was the Moo Loo.  The calves were given a diuretic so the team could control the visits.  As soon as a calf peed, it was given a treat by the researcher.  The team reported that 10 of the calves very quickly learned the desired behavior, and looked to the researcher immediately after they peed, some of them mid-stream.  This also has the moral implication that cows are aware of their behavior.  According to Grimm, the research team said cows have the cognitive ability of at least a human two year old.  It took only 10 visits or less for each calf to use the Moo Loo properly.

The environmental impact could be staggering.  Cow urine creates ammonia, which can transform into the highly toxic nitrous oxide.  Jan Langbein, co-author of the study, said that given that there are hundreds of millions of dairy cows in the world, “studies have shown that capturing 80% of cow urine would lead to a 56% reduction in ammonia emissions.”

So rather than fear mongering about green house emissions and how toxic cows are, maybe we should just use the simple solution and teach them how to use a Moo Loo.

RECOMMENDED READING:

Animal rights

EVENT_PLANT PROTEIN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FORUM

Plant Protein Science and Technology Forum

AOCS online forum October 12-14, 2021

$299 non-member, $199 member, $59 student-member

(AOCS – the American Oil Chemists Society)

Unfortunately I will not be able to attend this for financial reasons.  It is of particular interest as we see the rise of the vat grown burgers becoming a mainstream product instead the small niche market vegan burgers have traditionally been.  The vat grown burger, both cell-cultured and plant based, are marketed under the rubric of reducing animal cruelty and being better for the environment, hence this event’s categorization under Animal Rights.

 

Animal rights

REPOST: “A DELICIOUS HISTORY OF MEATLESS MEAT”

I really enjoyed this.

A Delicious History of “Meatless Meat”

Looking for some comments on what people think about the new vat-grown meat.  Clean language and consideration necessary for commenting.  Have we reached the age of the Jetsons?  Most of us are ok with technology vs nature on the issue of robo pets but what happens when its something we eat?

 

Also under Animal Rights:

The Rat Race is On!  Rats Learn to Drive!

Animal rights

THE RAT RACE IS ON! RATS LEARN TO DRIVE

Scientists teach rats to drive rat-sized car

Can you imagine waking up at 3am to raid on your refrigerator, flicking on the lights, and seeing a dozen rats drag racing down your kitchen tile?  Ok, so they aren’t doing the Indy 500 yet, but in the fabulously fun video below, scientists have used behavioral modification techniques and actually trained some rats to drive specially made rat-sized cars to the nearest Froot-loop dispenser.

Implications

One implication is that it confirms that animals are far more intelligent that we humans like to give them credit for.  The lack of tool use has been a standard argument against animal intelligence for the last several hundred years.  And the food and drug industry has a billion dollar interest in keeping things status quo.  The makeup industry has even more interest.  After all, we might think animal testing as the final step before human testing on critical, life saving medication may be justified.  But torturing intelligent animals capable of driving cars just to test yet another color of eyeshadow when there are millions of products equally as banal already available?  That’s much harder to sell as morally justified.

A second implication is that perhaps animals do not use tools as much as humans because they have no need to.  Historically, in hunter/gatherer societies, human chose to remain nomadic because nature provided adequate, and sometimes abundant, provision for all one’s basic needs.  Going beyond basic necessities and developing wants and luxuries created more work, and was deemed not to be worth the bother.  There are still nomadic ethnic groups who think city living just has zero appeal.  People who live in cities often work 60 hours a week.  We spend most of our  existence working to pay the rent.  We literally live to work and work to live.  Perhaps we should ponder the fact that apparently rats have always had the aptitude to drive cars.  But you throw in some Froot-loops, and bam!  Instant consumerism and the rat-race begins.

 

Dog buried with owner with a statue of the dog by its owner's grave
Animal rights

FOREVER FAMILY: PETS BURIED WITH OWNERS

This is something that should have happened a long time ago. A new law in New York has allowed cemeteries to bury pets with their owners.[1]  Most of us who own a furry companion view them as part of the family, and we promised them a forever home. In whatever Hereafter you believe in, we want to believe our pets will be there with us. And this new law allows the symbolic representation of that belief.

Pets Buried with Owners Controversy

Yet, this is a controversial change. For some, mixed burials are a violation of human dignity. Some animal lovers view it as a violation of animal dignity as well. Many state laws require that only certified pet cemeteries can cremate animals. Critics view the new laws as a money making scheme where mixed cemeteries would allow unscrupulous people to open pet crematoriums and just dump the bodies in the desert.[2]   A genuine concern exists that people will treat animals with dignity and respect after death as well as humans.

However, being a pet owner places one in a similar caregiver relationship as that of a parent and child. You are meeting the basic needs of an intelligent, self-aware, social creature who depends on you utterly but honors you with their trust and unconditional love in return. Hence, the social bond is described as the pet being a “furbaby”.

The term “furbaby” is in no way an offense to human dignity. It in no way blurs the line between human and animal. It does however reflect the depth of emotional commitment made to an animal who is a deeply personal part of your life: a being who lives with you, listens to you, loves you, is your best friend and confidant, makes you laugh, and brings you joy. If your pet is not your furbaby, you aren’t doing it right.

As in life, so in death

I am a firm believer in human dignity. But I think acknowledging animal dignity is compatible with a high notion of human dignity. I applaud the new laws that let me honor my promise to my furbabies that they now have a forever family.

 

 

Additional Reading:

  1. New Law Allows Pets To Be Buried Alongside Their Humans At Cemeteries
  2. Legislation would allow pets, humans at same crematory